A ruling that invoked the “anti-commandeering principle” to legalize sports betting in states holds implications for “sanctuary city” laws, too.
The Founders never intended for the Court to be the final arbiter of what the Constitution means.
Pete Buttigieg’s endorsement of a court-packing plan exemplifies the high court’s journey from afterthought to central concern among progressives.
The U.S. high court hands down its first 4-4 ruling since the death of Justice Antonin Scalia last month.
The Court will decide whether electors must vote for their party’s candidate, but no matter the answer, the system will still be a disaster.
Two law professors have found that it's not who makes a public policy decision but the nature of the decision made that's key to its acceptance.
Following the Supreme Court’s recent Arizona decision, voting-rights activists know they have to act fast.