The Constitution Is Perfectly Clear About Citizenship
The persistence of birtherism is a depressing feature of our corrupt and hateful national dialogue.
The persistence of birtherism is a depressing feature of our corrupt and hateful national dialogue.
“Unlawful assembly” is like “illegal writing” or “forbidden religious exercise”: There surely may be such a thing, but what qualifies?
But the Supreme Court refused to say that rescinding DACA won’t occur in the future.
The president may not be able to control what content Twitter and Facebook run, but he can still attempt to intimidate or silence the platforms.
Beneath the verbal jousting, the Court expressed dueling views of sexual orientation and gender, and how society should assess them.
The government cannot strip all Americans of their right to assemble, even if some demonstrations are violent.
The Court will decide whether electors must vote for their party’s candidate, but no matter the answer, the system will still be a disaster.
Lyle Denniston, one of the most seasoned Court watchers of all time, is unimpressed by the new format.
The Court will soon decide whether automated calls to cellphones, however annoying they may be, are constitutionally protected.
America’s new reality show begins Monday.