Justices acquitted themselves well during oral arguments on two pivotal cases this week.

A budget shortfall at the Nevada Supreme Court underlines a broader fiscal quandary

The U.S. Supreme Court justice imperiled the high court’s neutrality by weighing in on the 2016 presidential election.

The state’s refusal to comply has been met with a revealing silence on the right.

Its most recent term was a credit to the institution, not the abomination its critics allege.

A 5–4 decision gives the green light for states to use aggressive methods to remove voters from the rolls, a process that disproportionately affects minority communities.

The president returned to his con-law roots to hit Republicans on Merrick Garland’s stalled nomination.

By making it harder to punish official misconduct, the justices risk damage to America's republican institutions.