"Comparativism"—using foreign legal rulings to help interpret the Constitution—is startlingly on the rise in the U.S. Supreme Court
As the 2016 elections near, the entire U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals will reconsider the state’s voter-ID law.
How far do religious-liberty claims actually extend following the Supreme Court's ruling?
But the Supreme Court refused to say that rescinding DACA won’t occur in the future.
Flowers v. Mississippi reveals a rickety American legal system.
With a Supreme Court vacancy after Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death, Republican senators must again choose between country and party.
Saying nothing often is saying something.
Don't you want your Supreme Court justices to be a bit more unflappable than that?
And Congress should claw it back.