Their ability to hold on to their job should not depend on the same people they challenge in court.
A federal court enjoined much of a Texas law that punished officials who dared “endorse” the view that its provisions were harmful to public safety.
A 9-0 decision to let California proceed with its crazy recall would strike a blow against government by judiciary.
A legal analysis of a provision in the contract that may pose problems for the president-elect
No president I know of has asserted a blanket power to reject any request that doesn’t suit him—until Donald Trump.
Whether they delight or disappoint, old books provide touchstones for tracking personal growth.
The liberal justices expanded the rights of corporations, without considering the limits of that doctrine.
Samuel Alito's 1985 job application, when considered together with his 300 judicial opinions, places him much closer than his critics to the center of American public opinion.
By comparing himself with a New Deal obstructionist, the conservative judge raises questions about the Court's future—and his own legacy.