The first days of the criminal case against the former president have been mundane, even boring—and that’s remarkable.

When it comes to race-based admissions, both sides contain people of good will. And neither group can understand a word the other says.

A Houston attorney wants the Supreme Court to define what it means to be a natural-born citizen, but the lawsuit seems certain to be tossed.

Republicans floating Merrick Garland for FBI director should be careful what they wish for.

Disparate-impact claims have a long record of opening doors in employment, education, voting, and housing. Conservatives want to bury them.

One day before Harvard goes to court to defend its admissions practices, two warring rallies made clear that the trial is about much more than just the university.

Lawmakers have argued that the Chinese internet is better for kids. They’re wrong.

Cities are arguing that they, too, were damaged by risky loans, and that they should be able to take the lenders to court to regain their losses.

Attacking the judges handling his cases is likely to backfire. But if it works, it will really work.