No good legal reason exists to delay Donald Trump’s January 6 trial any further.
The judiciary has some tools to enforce presidential compliance, but their effectiveness depends ultimately on the vigilance of the American people.
The Supreme Court seems to be endorsing his views on presidential power.
The Court is encouraging deference to the executive branch—when it likes the results.
The conservative justices have shown they are ready to sacrifice any law or principle to save the former president.
And why the special counsel’s last-ditch January 6 filing may not matter
The court is too radical to win even this Supreme Court’s approval, but not too radical to influence it deeply.
The decision in SEC v. Jarkesy puts much of the basic work of the executive branch at risk.
A recent Supreme Court case marks the end of America’s three-decade experiment with extreme leniency.
Trump’s administration is only pretending to comply with the Supreme Court on the matter of a Maryland man it deported erroneously.