In court, the Trump administration is required to tell the truth.

A federal appeals court said Thursday the president’s controversial executive order “drips with religious intolerance, animus, and discrimination.”

City of Grants Pass v. Johnson skips over the real issues.

The justices ordered the government to seek the return of a man whom it had wrongfully deported.

The Founders had disagreements about the role of religion in America’s public schools, but there was always one line they would not cross.

The president is not just abusing the immunity that the Supreme Court granted him. He might be seeking to expand it.

The Supreme Court announced Monday it will review the president’s controversial executive order next term. But in the meantime, the administration can enforce some of its provisions.

The U.S. Supreme Court upholds Obamacare in a 6-3 decision, deferring to the intent of legislators.

Beneath the technical arguments at the Supreme Court last week was an effort to take away one of the only really effective legal tools for reining in the executive branch.