
What, Exactly, Is the Supreme Court Thinking?
The justices exhibit a disturbing willingness to ignore the human costs of Trump’s actions, preferring instead to remain within the more comfortable zone of high-minded legal theory.
The justices exhibit a disturbing willingness to ignore the human costs of Trump’s actions, preferring instead to remain within the more comfortable zone of high-minded legal theory.
Trump isn’t listening to what the stock market is telling him. He’s not negotiating with foreign leaders in good faith. He’s not hearing what corporate CEOs are saying.
How the Latin Mass split the Church
MAGA supporters are attempting to understand Trump’s catastrophic decision making, while accepting Trump’s infallibility as a given.
The older you are, and the more likely you are to get laid off, the more important it is to have liquid savings.
The president’s allies are putting up a bigger fight than the opposition party is.
The Trump administration’s arguments in a high-profile immigration case have much broader implications.
Her ghostwritten autobiography diminishes her, and I found out why.
Towns near the Canadian border are suffering.
Putin’s Russia shows what happens when billionaire businessmen choose to back a strongman.
When I joined the conservative movement in the 1980s, there were two types of people: those who cared earnestly about ideas, and those who wanted only to shock the left. The reactionary fringe has won.
People with generational wealth control a society that they don’t understand.
The Danes seem to believe him, and so should Americans.
Trump is an agent of chaos, and chaos has a human cost.
Deliberately insulting other countries is bad for the U.S. economy.
Investors discounted everything Trump has ever said about trade and tariffs. We’re all going to pay for that mistake.
Canada’s ultimate retaliation for Trump’s tariffs will be to turn ordinary Americans who cross the border to shop for cheaper goods into latter-day bootleggers.
Officials have been careless with sensitive information while claiming that innocuous facts can’t be public.
The public has not responded kindly to other politicians who have tried this in the past.
The administration claims to be protecting Jews while advancing an agenda that most Jews oppose.