The Crumbleys Are Being Scapegoated for America’s Gun Failures
A society that has refused to regulate guns is now punishing parents for not doing so on their own at home.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd76a/fd76a1370f7768f987f011d84070b01ddc3b3c1b" alt="Jennifer Crumbley looks at her husband James Crumbley during their sentencing on four counts of involuntary manslaughter for the deaths of four Oxford High School students by their son, mass school shooter Ethan Crumbley, on April 9, 2024 at Oakland County Circuit Court in Pontiac, Michigan."
A society that has refused to regulate guns is now punishing parents for not doing so on their own at home.
And that should theoretically appeal to the Supreme Court’s conservative justices.
The former president’s testimony in a New York courtroom was a sad spectacle for the country.
No-fault divorce has improved the lives of millions. Now some extreme Republicans want to abandon it.
The ubiquitous question posed during the Trump presidency—“Can he do that?”—continues to be the wrong question.
Unless—perhaps—Special Counsel Jack Smith indicts Trump for his role in the January 6 insurrection at the Capitol.
Whatever conservative ethos of restraint there once was has vanished.
In West Virginia v. EPA, the conservative justices acted like they were handing power to the people, but in reality they were giving it to themselves.
It’s not legislation.