The Simple Principle That Can Fix American Law
What if a coherent legal philosophy could exist between the poles of living constitutionalism and originalism?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09ea6/09ea6ef42ce7846bb45dca55a487ffa545e9b211" alt="An illustration of Lady Justice standing on a tightrope"
What if a coherent legal philosophy could exist between the poles of living constitutionalism and originalism?
Both gun-rights advocates and educational equity activists use similar legal strategies. Why does the Supreme Court treat them so differently?